2002 GMC Denali: problems, recalls and reliability
1 recall and 23 owner complaints on record; most reports concern engine and engine cooling.
Data updated weekly · latest recall Sep 2002
All counts are reports filed with NHTSA in the United States - US market only, not worldwide totals.
Common problems
Computed from 23 owner complaints filed with NHTSA for this exact model year.
“Front running light has been replaced twice and is out again. My mechanic stated he has seen several gmc autos with the same problem. Is there a recall or reason? *tr”Owner report · Exterior Lighting · Apr 2009
“We own a 2002 denali, that we bought used. The transmission went out around nov. 2008 (appr. 120,000 miles) we had the transmission replaced but the transmission went out again shortly thereafter (around 150,000). Through civil litigation, we found out that the transmission had went out previously, at around 70,000 miles. We are wondering if this is a common problem with denalis and if any compensation is available. *tr”Owner report · Engine And Engine Cooling · Nov 2008
“Tl*the contact owns a 2002 gmc denali. The contact stated that the vbraked vibrate when attempting to stop and continued to accelerate forward a few feet. The contact stated that the vehicle had an increased stopping distance at low speeds. The mechanic stated that there was a recall # 05v379000 for the hydraulic antilock service brakes. The dealer stated that the vehicle was not included in the recall. The contact stated that the ABS indicator light failed to illuminate when the increased stopping distance occurred. The current mileage wass 31,857 and failure mileage was 31,843.”Owner report · Service Brakes, Hydraulic · Apr 2007
Show 7 more owner reports
“Dt*: the contact stated while driving 10 mph on a city street, a clunking sound was heard followed by the transmission failing to shift gears upon acceleration. The vehicle was towed to a dealer who determined the automatic transmission gear teeth were fractured and worn. The dealer determined the gear teeth needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was notified. Updated 10/6/2006 - the stabilizer became worn. *nm”Owner report · Power Train · Sep 2006
“Dt: the owner turned left in turning lane and applied the brakes and truck kept on . The brakes had been mashed, and they would not stop. The brakes had worked up to the point before the wreck. The vehicle was constantly serviced. Owner's vehicle hit another car, and created a three car pile up. There was one reported injury from this incident. The vehicle is in the shop at this point for repairs.*ak”Owner report · Service Brakes, Hydraulic · Jun 2005
“While driving at any speed, the driver heard a loud knocking noise coming from the front. The vehicle jerked and vibrated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection. The mechanic informed the driver that the rack and pinion needed to be replaced. Please provide further details. *nm”Owner report · Steering · Nov 2004
“Dt: while driving on the interstate at 70 mph the consumer was side swiped and knocked into the median, in which the side air bags failed to deploy. Updated 12/27/05. *jb”Owner report · Air Bags · Jul 2004
“Consumer had to hit brakes suddenly. Rear seat belts were inoperative. Didn't hold child in place, child launched forward, as a result of seatbelt loosening up instead of tightening. *ak”Owner report · Seat Belts · Aug 2002
“Upon first start-up in the morning the engine taps for 10 to15 seconds. The length of time and noise level increases when the vehicle sits for two days. It is parked on level ground and the oil level is good. It sounds to me like a lifter is leaking down. Shortly after vehicle was purchased, it was brought back because of an oil leak. The dealer service department disc that the front differential connector on the left side was where the oil was originating from and corrected the loose vent connector. The dealer service invoice doesn't state how much fluid was added if any. Service advisor did not know the answer. *la”Owner report · Engine And Engine Cooling · Jul 2002
“Front turn signals (above bumper) are not visible in daylight because the daytime running lights are too bright and right next to turn signal bulb (worse if viewed across grille) . Not visible in mirrors to a vehicle in front. My vehicle changed lanes at same time to her suv and she ran off road to avoid collision. My vehicle is a truck. No impact of vehicles /no police report was filed.. Gm needs to lower wattage or aim them down so they dont blind other motorists. This problem is aggravated at dusk or dawn (this incident).*ak”Owner report · Exterior Lighting · Apr 2002
When filing, owners marked a crash in 3 of these complaints and injuries in 3 - self-reported to NHTSA, not verified accident statistics.
Recalls - 1 campaign
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH REARWARD FOLDING HEAD RESTRAINTS ON THE SECOND ROW SEATS, TWO POTENTIAL PINCH POINTS EXIST ON EACH OF THE FOLDING HEAD RESTRAINTS WHEN THE RESTRAINTS ARE FOLDED REARWARD AS THE SEATBACK IS FOLDED DOWN.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL PROTECTIVE COVERS OVER THE PINCH POINTS. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN NOVEMBER 8, 2002. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-222-1020, GMC AT 1-800-462-8782, OR CADILLAC AT 1-800-458-8006.
How other years compare
Check your exact Denali by VIN
Recalls and equipment differ between individual vehicles. Decode your VIN to see what applies to yours.
Open VIN decoderFrequently asked questions
Is the 2002 GMC Denali reliable?
NHTSA has 23 owner complaints and 1 recall campaign on record for the 2002 GMC Denali. The most complained-about area is engine and engine cooling.
Does the 2002 GMC Denali have open recalls?
1 recall campaign has been issued, the latest concerning seats:front assembly:head restraint. Check your specific vehicle by VIN - recall repairs are free at franchised dealers.
Source: NHTSA recall campaigns and owner complaints (public domain). Counts reflect reports on file and are not a defect rate.